Legal Opinion
City of Groton v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 8, 1975PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
These two appeals from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court sustaining appeals by Pioneer Hose Company No. 1, hereinafter Pioneer, and the city of Groton, hereinafter Groton, from an order of the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, hereinafter commission, have been ordered consolidated upon motion of the parties. The basic facts are not in dispute and, together with the relevant procedural background, have been fully set forth in the memorandum of decision filed by the trial court and in the statement of facts and finding filed by the commission.
*91The appeals arise from a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Wenzel v. Town of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Gannon v. SandersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. McGannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Valley Cable Vision, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. BeckenbachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.