Legal Opinion

Imperial Water Co. No. 4 v. Meserve

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 3810PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Plaintiff, a mutual water company incorporated under the laws of this state, brings this action against Lizzie H. Meserve and her two sons, Edwin A. Meserve and Harry W. Meserve, to recover the sum of $681.28 alleged to be due for “water sold and delivered” to defendants. Judgment for that sum was rendered against the three defendants, two of whom, Edwin A. and Harry W. Meserve, have taken this appeal.

In a complaint consisting of three counts plaintiff alleges : In the first count, that defendants “purchased from plaintiff” and the latter “sold and delivered to defendants,” for agricultural…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ZarateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Bay City Building & Loan Ass'n v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stone v. Imperial Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Wheat v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bandy v. WestoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Imperial Water Co. No. 4 v. MeserveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API