Stone v. Imperial Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George H. P. Shaw, H. N. Dyke, and Shaw & Dyke, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint and thereupon gave judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.
The action was begun by the filing of the original complaint on April 21, 1909. Thereafter, by leave of court, the plaintiff, on April 11, 1913, filed the said second amended complaint. The court below sustained the demurrer to the second amended complaint on the ground that the causes of action alleged in the original complaint and in the said second amended complaint were each causes of action for trespass on real property; that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Atkinson v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Parker v. SwettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Stesel v. Santa Ana River Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.