Legal Opinion

Bay City Building & Loan Ass'n v. Broad

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1902No. S.F. No. 2206PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the provisions of sections 633-648-J of the Civil Code, as amended in 1891 (Stats. 1891, p. 252). In the year 1893 Hu Jones was a member of the plaintiff and the owner of certain shares of its capital stock, and on March 22d of that year borrowed from it the sum of twenty-four hundred dollars, for which he gave his promissory note, and for the purpose of securing its payment executed to the plaintiff a pledge of his said shares of its capital stock, and also a mortgage upon certain land. He afterwards conveyed the land to the appellant, subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Camp v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Grangers' Business Ass'n v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers Exchange National Bank v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Leon v. Citizens' Building & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Frese v. Mutual Life Insurance of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Graham v. Young Et UxSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API