Legal Opinion
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 2009No. A07-310PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In 2005, appellant City of West St. Paul entered into an abatement plan with respondent Alice Krengel following multiple incidents of public nuisance activity at her home. Although there was no further nuisance activity, Krengel did violate the abatement plan. Based on the abatement plan violations and the prior nuisance activity, the City sought an injunction in 2006 that would bar Krengel from occupying her home. Citing the prior nuisance activity as proof of a nuisance under the Public Nuisance Law, Minn.Stat. §§ 617.80-87 (2006), the district court enjoined Krengel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District v. StengrimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.