Legal Opinion
Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District v. Stengrim
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 2010No. A08-825PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
The parties to the present litigation have a long history of conflict, both in district court and otherwise, culminating in the current action brought by Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District against James Stengrim in Marshall County District Court. The Watershed District sought to enforce a settlement agreement arising out of earlier litigation in which Stengrim agreed to “address no further challenges” to a flood management project in the Red River Valley. Stengrim filed a motion to dismiss the present litigation pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 56…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ralph Nader v. Maine Democratic PartySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Nexus v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Johannesen v. EddinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.