Legal Opinion
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 2007No. A05-1293PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellants Production Resource Group, L.L.C. (PRG), Haas Multiples Environmental Marketing and Design, Inc., d/b/a Entolo-Minneapolis, and Entolo, Inc. (collectively, appellants), seek review of a court of appeals decision reversing the trial court’s decision partially dismissing on summary judgment a lawsuit brought by respondents Hoyt Properties, Inc., and Hoyt/Winnetka, L.L.C. (collectively, Hoyt). Hoyt alleged that a settlement agreement it signed with appellants, which included a release provision relieving PRG of any future liability, was invalid because the release…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.