Legal Opinion
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 23, 2013No. A11-0159PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
This appeal asks us to determine whether appellants are obligated under an insurance policy and an indemnification provision in a construction contract to reimburse respondent Engineering and Construction Innovations, Inc. (“ECI”) for expenses ECI incurred in repairing a damaged sewer pipeline. Appellant L.H. Bolduc Company, Inc. (“Bolduc”), the subcontractor of ECI, damaged a sewer pipe during the course of a construction project. After ECI repaired the damage, it sought reimbursement from Bolduc’s insurer, appellant The Travelers Indemnity Company of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Olmsted Medical Center v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- The Netherlands Insurance Co. v. Main Street Ingredients, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Harleysville Insurance Company v. Physical Distribution ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- C.S. McCrossan Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.