Legal Opinion
Matter of Schmidt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1989No. C4-88-2593PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant Everett Schmidt, a resident at the Moose Lake Regional Treatment Center, claims that Minn.Stat. § 253B.03, subd. 6a (1988), a statute governing the administration of neuroleptic medication to mentally ill persons committed to state hospitals, impermissibly infringes on the privacy and due process rights guaranteed to him by the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Minnesota. Following a Jarvis hearing, 1 the Carlton County District Court issued an order authorizing the administration of neuroleptic medication and an order declaring that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re McCaskillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Jasper v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.