Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto Nicolas Castro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1992No. 91-50369PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Roberto Castro appeals from the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict against him for conspiracy and five counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that: 1) the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to substitute new counsel; 2) his convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence; 3) the use of the amended Sentencing Guidelines in his case was a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause; and 4) the district court erred in increasing his offense level for being a leader of the conspiracy. We have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Melvin Frank SchaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BracyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jimenez RecioSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.