Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. Reynolds

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1983No. 81-1728, 81-1729PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Ramirez and Reynolds, along with codefendants Peterson, Miller, and Baerenwald, were indicted for conspiracy to transport stolen aircraft, import marijuana, and distribute marijuana, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count I); foreign transportation of stolen aircraft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (Counts II & III); importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 960(a)(1) (Counts IV & VI); and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Counts V & VII). 1 Appellants were tried before a jury in a joint trial.…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API