Legal Opinion

United States v. Cordoba

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1997No. 95-50492PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether our per se rule excluding the admission of unstipulated polygraph evidence was effectively overruled by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). We conclude it was and vacate Defendant Cordoba’s conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We affirm the remainder of the district court’s evidentiary rulings.

I

We have long expressed our hostility to the admission of unstipulated polygraph evidence. See United States v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Watkins v. Telsmith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API