Legal Opinion

Rivas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2001No. 97-CF-304PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge.

Applying principles of constructive possession, a jury convicted appellant Balta-zar Rivas and his codefendant Jose Melgar of possessing, with intent to distribute, cocaine found in plastic bags that lay between them in the console of a car in which Melgar was the driver and Rivas the front seat passenger. A division of this court affirmed both convictions in Rivas v. United States, 734 A.2d 655 (D.C.1999) (Rivas I). We granted Rivas’s petition for rehearing en banc in order to reconsider a rule followed in Rivas I and other recent cases that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API