Legal Opinion

Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2017No. 12-CM-523PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*317Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Easterly.

Opinion by Associate Judge Thompson, concurring in part and dissenting in part, at page 330.

Easterly, Associate Judge:

We return to this case, sitting en banc, to determine what, if anything, the government must prove vis-á-vis a defendant’s mens rea, or state of mind, in order to obtain a conviction for threats (misdemeanor or felony).1 Our threats statutes do not give us much guidance; neither expressly includes a requisite culpable mental state. And in the wake of this statutory silence, we developed two strands of case law: one indicating…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Johnnie Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Jonathan Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Beachum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API