Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*317Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Easterly.
Opinion by Associate Judge Thompson, concurring in part and dissenting in part, at page 330.
Easterly, Associate Judge:
We return to this case, sitting en banc, to determine what, if anything, the government must prove vis-á-vis a defendant’s mens rea, or state of mind, in order to obtain a conviction for threats (misdemeanor or felony).1 Our threats statutes do not give us much guidance; neither expressly includes a requisite culpable mental state. And in the wake of this statutory silence, we developed two strands of case law: one indicating…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Johnnie Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jonathan Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Beachum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.