Legal Opinion
Moore v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 00-CF-1016, 00-CF-1111PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge.
Appellants John Moore and Clifton Durant seek reversal of their convictions for narcotics and weapons offenses. They raise a variety of challenges, some of which have limited merit, but none of which entitles either of them to the requested relief. We affirm the judgments of conviction.
I
Durant, his wife Christina Durant, and Moore were charged in a seven-count indictment with the crimes of maintaining a crack house, possession of a prohibited weapon (a semi-automatic Beretta handgun), and other weapons-related offenses. 1 The indictment also charged each of the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- United States v. ShetlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- James M. Schools v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.