Legal Opinion

People v. McClain

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided June 2, 1934No. Cr. A. No. 1030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

This case, like People v. Garcia, 1 Cal. App. (Supp.) (2d) 761 [32 Pac. (2d) 445, 2 Cal. Supp. 122], and People v. Arthur, 1 Cal. App. (Supp.) (2d) 768 [32 Pac. (2d) 1002, 2 Cal. Supp. 127], recently decided by us, arises under the State Pharmacy Act (Stats. 1905, p. 535), as amended in 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 2192). The complaint here contains three counts, each charging that *753the defendant permitted the sale of “drugs and medicines, to-wit, aspirin”, by an unregistered person, at a store or shop of which defendant “was the manager”.

Attack is made on the complaint because it does not allege…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ferguson v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. HeronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. HeronAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API