Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Pacific National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1944No. Civ. No. 12620PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This action, in the nature of conversion, was brought for the recovery of certain personal property pledged to the defendant, Pacific National Bank of San Francisco, by Dalmo Manufacturing Company as security for the payment of a number of promissory notes upon which at the date of the commencement of the action the sum of $5,421.23 remained due, or for damages in case the return of the property could not be had; also for the recovery of $5,000, the amount of a cashier’s check pledged to the defendant by T. I. Moseley, president of the Dalmo company, for the same purpose. MacDonald is the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Sausalito Bay Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Watson v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Hudgens v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ogilvie v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ferro v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Hutchison v. Southern California First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Law v. HeinigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API