Legal Opinion
Law v. Heiniger
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1955No. Civ. A. 8628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action in “claim and delivery,’’ in which it is alleged that both defendants detain from the possession of the plaintiff a $500 sapphire ring belonging to him. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that denied him any relief as to defendant Sidney Fisher and which limited his relief as to defendant Jean Heiniger to the recovery of possession of the ring or, in case possession could not be had, to its value “which is fixed at $93.89.” We have determined that the judgment should be reversed as to defendant Sidney Fisher, but that it should be affirmed as to defendant Jean…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Riciotto v. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilson v. MatteiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- G and G Productions LLC v. Rita RusicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. Highlands InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.