Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Sausalito Bay Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8184PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action for the specific performance of a contract or in lieu thereof for damages.

On August 4, 1905, the plaintiffs W. 1A. and Harriet A. Coulter were the owners of lots 11, 12, 13 and 14 in block 10 in the town of Sausalito. They continued in such ownership until May 10, 1923, when they conveyed the same to plaintiff James Valentine Coulter. Said block is bounded by Valley, Third and Fourth Streets, and on the date first mentioned the Sausalito Bay Water Company, a corporation, owned a portion of block 6, which was directly across Third Street from the Coulter property, and,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Town of Vinton v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  5. Miller v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API