Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: ECF No. 97
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant Virgin America’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 97. The Court will deny the motion in part and grant the motion in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs are flight attendants who currently work or have previously worked for Defendant Virgin America, Inc. (“Virgin”). In this class action against Virgin, the Plaintiffs allege that Virgin did not pay them for hours worked before, after, and between flights; time spent in training; time on reserve; time spent taking…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Hirst v. Skywest, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Cabardo v. PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Shook v. Indian River Transport Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.