Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 58, 59
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
The parties cross-move for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claims that Delta violates California Labor Code section 226 by failing to provide Flight Attendants who work for any amount of time on the ground in California individualized wage statements disclosing the total hours worked at specific hourly rates.1 Plaintiffs also separately move for summary judgment on their PAGA claim under Labor Code section 204, arguing that Delta fails to make timely wage payments for pay…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Shook v. Indian River Transport Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Kudatsky v. Tyler TechnologiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021