Legal Opinion
Shook v. Indian River Transport Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2017No. CIV. NO. 1:14-1415 WBS BAMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs, truck drivers formerly employed by Indian River Transport Co. (“Indian River”), brought this action on behalf of themselves and similarly aggrieved employees against Indian River alleging various violations of California law, including 1) Labor Code § 226.7 (failure to provide mandated rest breaks); 2) Labor Code § 226(a) (failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements); 3) Labor Code §§ 2699, et seq. (California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”)) (failure to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. David LanierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sarviss v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Hill v. Workday, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Hill v. Workday, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Huddleston v. John Christner Trucking, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.