Legal Opinion

Cabardo v. Patacsil

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2017No. 2:12-cv-01705-TLN-KJNPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

This is a lawsuit asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and several California wage-and-hour laws. The matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.1 (ECF No. 44.) Defendants Marilyn Patacsil (“Marilyn”) and Ernesto Patacsil (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. (ECF No. 49.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs are former employees of Pa-tacsil Care Homes, a group of residential care homes owned…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Furry v. E. Bay Publ'g, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Furry v. East Bay PublishingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API