Legal Opinion

Altman v. Kilburn

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1941No. 4569PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

There is involved here the question whether the New Mexico , statute of limitations has run against street paving certificate or bond obligations issued by the town of Clayton.

Appellee, plaintiff below, filed his complaint seeking foreclosure of certain paving liens represented by paving certificates or bonds, issued by the said town, of which certificates or bonds he was the owner and holder. Appellants, defendants below, as owners of some of the abutting lots sought to be foreclosed, answered setting up, among other defenses, the controlling one that the causes of action sued…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Gutierrez v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. City of Hartford v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Board of Education, School District 16 v. StandhardtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ghahate v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Griffith v. HumbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Albuquerque v. HuddlestonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API