Legal Opinion

City of Albuquerque v. Huddleston

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1951No. 5320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The appellants seek the reversal of a judgment quieting title in the appellee to two lots in Albuquerque purchased by it at a sale following the foreclosure of paving liens. ' A number of lots in various ownerships were involved in the foreclosure suit, and some of the defendants, including the predecessor in title of the appellants, pleaded the statute of limitations as to lots owned by them, and had the suit dismissed as to their property on account of such pleas. The appellant, Oscar L. Huddleston, however, suffered default and allowed his lots to be sold to the city.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. American Salt Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Altman v. KilburnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wilkerson v. BadaraccoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blea v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. United Salt Corp. v. McKeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Shilts v. YoungAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Atlantic Refining Company v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas Ltd. P'ship v. Benson-Montin-Greer Drilling Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API