Legal Opinion

Gutierrez v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1929No. 3441PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CATRON, J.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the lower court, filed their amended petition for an injunction to restrain the defendants from selling or disposing of any bonds, debentures, or other evidence of indebtedness or performing any other act that would adversely affect the property and rights of plaintiffs, under the authority contained in the New Mexico Conservancy Act, chapter 45 of the Laws of 1927, upon the ground that said act is unconstitutional. Appellees filed what is termed a “Motion for Want of Equity,” as well as a demurrer, challenging the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. O'NEILL v. LeamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People ex rel. Setters v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Newby v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Lebeck v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority v. SwinburneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Westland Development Co. v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API