Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Humble

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1942No. 4675PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

Appellant challenges the action of,the trial court in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to his complaint in foreclosure of a real estate mortgage.^ The court sustained the demurrer upon the ground that the statute of limitations had run against such action. The trial court appraised the pertinent statute upon which appellees rely (§ 83-101, 103 N.M.Comp.Laws 1929) as applying to the mortgage, upon the theory that it was a “contract in writing.” The statute in question reads:

83-101. Limitations of Actions. “The following suits or actions may be brought within the time hereinafter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. American Mortgage Co. v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Baca v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co. v. Aztec Gold Mining & Milling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roybal v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. CouchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Davey v. DaveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Hill v. District Court of Eighth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Slemmons v. MassieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API