Legal Opinion
State v. Riddell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 28, 2001No. 9904-42781; CA A106786PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for criminal trespass in the second degree. ORS 164.245. He argues that the trial court erred in refusing to permit him to challenge the validity of an exclusion order, issued several weeks before his arrest, that the state used to establish that defendant failed to leave premises open to the public “after being lawfully directed to do so by the person in charge.” ORS 164.205; ORS 164.245. 1 We reverse and remand for a new trial.
We state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Cervantes, 319 Or 121, 125, 873 P2d 316 (1994). On March…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SimsOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.