Legal Opinion

State v. Cargill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 1990No. DA369633-8805 CA A49496 (Control)) (DA369634-8805 CA A49497) (DA369631-8805 CA A49498) (DA369632-8805 CA A49499) (DA369629-8805 CA A49500) (DA369630-8805 CA A49501PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants appeal their convictions for criminal trespass in the second degree. ORS 164.245. The trial court reduced the charges from Class C misdemeanors to violations. ORS 161.565(2). After a trial to the court, it found defendants guilty and gave each a sentence of discharge. ORS 137.010(7)(d); ORS 161.715. We reverse.

Defendants stood on a sidewalk between the parking lot of the Fred Meyer store at 3805 S.E. Hawthorne in Portland and the store’s main entrance, seeking signatures on several initiative petitions. Both the parking lot and the sidewalk were private property that Fred Meyer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. DiGuidaIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wilhoite v. Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. ViglielmoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API