State v. Cervantes
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.
Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant the right to a trial “in the county in which the offense shall have been committed. ’ ’ This venue requirement is a material allegation of the indictment that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Cooksey, 242 Or 250, 251, 409 P2d 335 (1965); State v. Jones, 240 Or 129, 130, 400 P2d 524 (1965). The issue in this criminal case is whether the state introduced sufficient evidence to establish venue beyond a reasonable doubt. We hold that it did.
After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of rape in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MirandaOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CookseyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Elizabeth Diane Downs v. Sonia HoytCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.