Legal Opinion
Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 2000No. CC 9110-06504; CA A88372; SC S45547PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*41GILLETTE, J.
The underlying issue in this false arrest case is whether this court’s decision in Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen, 315 Or 500, 849 P2d 446 (1993) (Whiffen II), correctly states the law of Oregon under Article IV, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution,1 with respect to the right of initiative petitioners to utilize private property over the objection of the property owner. A majority of the Court of Appeals, considering itself bound by that precedent, concluded that it does. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 153 Or App 442, 451, 958 P2d 854 (1998). For the reasons that follow, we now…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.