Legal Opinion

State v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 2002No. 9906-45661; A108615PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for criminal trespass in the second degree, ORS 164.245, based on his alleged violation of a Drug Free Zone (DFZ) exclusion order. We conclude that defendant’s conduct, as proved at trial, did not constitute criminal trespass in that defendant did not “enter or remain unlawfully” in or upon premises within the meaning of ORS 164.205(3)(a) or (b). Consequently, we reverse defendant’s conviction.

The material facts are undisputed. In March 1998, defendant was arrested for both possession and delivery of a controlled substance in an area that the City of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. J-G-D-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. EtzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API