Legal Opinion

Humiston v. Shaffer

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1904No. L.A. No. 1577PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

The plaintiff was employed in the office of the district attorney of the county of San Diego during the month of January, 1904, and did certain typewriting for the district attorney during said month, from the second to the twenty-ninth days inclusive. She presented a claim against the county, duly itemized and verified, showing the total amount of the claim to be $49.30. The claim consisted of one hundred different items performed by plaintiff for the district attorney as stenographer and typewriter, the work being in connection with the official duties of the district attorney,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Matter of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. County of Kern v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. County of Orange v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Agard v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Calaveras v. PoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Wines v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Langdon v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Rocca v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API