Legal Opinion

Matter of Dodge

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1902No. S.F. No. 2506PublishedCited by 15 opinions

■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The controversy in this case was submitted to the court below without action, under sections 1138, 1139, and 1140 of the Code of Civil Procedure. From the agreed statement of the case, it appears that between the first Mondays in March and July, 1900, said Dodge, as assessor of the city and county of San Francisco, collected and paid into the treasury of said city and county, on account of poll-taxes, the total sum of $93,872, without any deductions on account of percentage for the collection of the same, but that said Dodge, as assessor, claims the sum of $14,080.80, being fifteen per cent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Kern v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. City of Sacramento v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Humiston v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API