Legal Opinion
Agard v. Shaffer
California Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1904No. L.A. No. 1406PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The respondent, Agard, in a clerical capacity, assisted the recorder of San Diego County in the preparation of abstracts of mortgages to be furnished to the assessor of the same county, pursuant to the provisions of section 3678 of the Political Code. The board of supervisors of said county thereafter determined that the employment of respondent by the recorder was necessary to do such work, and allowed his claim therefor, amounting to $1,304. The county auditor refused to draw his warrant for the claim, and Agard brought this proceeding in the superior court, and obtained judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kirkwood v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Humiston v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. GareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hanson v. the UnderhillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Frame v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918