Langdon v. Koster
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Auditor of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is a mandate to compel the auditor of the city and county of San Francisco to audit the demand of the petitioner for expenses incurred by him. The expenses are for the payment of the services of William J. Burns as “special agent” at the rate of six hundred and twenty-five dollars a month, and of certain enumerated “assistant special agents” at the rate of one hundred and fifty dollars a month, the total aggregating for the month of April, 1909, the sum of twenty-six hundred and fifty dollars. These demands were presented to the auditor by the individual claimants, and upon his rejection…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Humiston v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Rocca v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Cunning v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- In Re Claims of HydeMontana Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.