Legal Opinion

County of Calaveras v. Poe

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. Sac. No. 2090PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County. A. I. McSorley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants appeal from the judgment. This case was decided upon an agreed statement of facts. Adam W. Poe was duly elected to the consolidated offices of county clerk, county auditor, and county recorder of Calaveras County, a county of the thirty-third class, for the term beginning January 7,1907. At that time his salary as recorder was fixed by statute at one thousand five hundred dollars per a.Tinnm (Stats. 1903, p. 241), and the “County Government Act” also contained the following provision: “The salaries and fees provided for in this act shall be in full compensation for all services of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People ex rel. Dunn v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Higby v. Calavers CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Humiston v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Santa Cruz County v. McKnightArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Norton v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Uhler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API