Legal Opinion

Wines v. Garrison

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1923No. S. F. No. 10513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus. Charles L. Wines, the petitioner, is a deputy in the office of the superintendent of schools of Alameda County. When the superintendent of schools began his term on January 6, 1919, he was allowed an assistant, a chief deputy and an additional deputy, but in 1921 the legislature allowed the superintendent of schools an additional deputy. The petitioner fills the position thus created for the first time by the legislature of 1921. His petition., he says, “involves the right of the legislature to increase the number of deputies allowed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Taylor v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Gallarno v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Bayley v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Leo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Moore v. WalleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API