Henninger v. State Farm Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm). We reverse.
The facts and procedural history can be summarized as follows: On November 12, 1992, Wanda S. Henninger (Henninger) was injured in an automobile accident. Because Henninger was insured pursuant to a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by State Farm, she presented it with claims for first-party medical and wage loss benefits. State Farm denied these claims. Consequently, on October 18, 1994, Henninger filed a complaint alleging that State Farm…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Nenna & Frain, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Freidenbloom v. WeyantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Horne v. HaladaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Quate v. American Standard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lynady v. Community Medical Center, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2000
- Beecham v. American Life & Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.