Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiff/appellee, Borden, Inc. (“Borden”), sued defendant/appellant, Advent Ink Company (“Advent”), in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County to recover moneys owed for goods delivered but not paid for. Advent counterclaimed for damages allegedly sustained as a result of a previous shipment of defective goods. The trial court granted Borden’s motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim and declared its order to be final pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c). Concluding that Borden’s limitation of damages clause was enforceable, although its disclaimer of warranties was not,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Germantown Manufacturing Co. v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Grossman v. BarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API