Legal Opinion

Beecham v. American Life & Casualty Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided January 17, 2003No. 1998 CV 3147PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MINORA, J.,

This matter comes before the court by way of a motion for summary judg*54ment filed by American Life and Casualty Insurance Company. Plaintiffs William and Dorothy Beecham initiated this action to recover compensatory and punitive damages allegedly incurred by them as a result of American’s conduct. In short, the Beechams claim that American did not notify them that it was terminating the employment of its agent, Patrick J. Idaspe, and had American done so, the Beechams would not have continued to deal with Mr. Idaspe. While American admits that it did not notify the Beechams of Mr.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re K-Dur Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API