Haymore v. Levinson

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiffs Haymore recovered judgment for $2,739 for money payable under a contract by which they sold defendants Lev-inson a house. The essence of Levin-sons’ defense below and contention for reversal here is that there had been no “satisfactory completion” of the house as required by the contract.

The question involved is what the term “satisfactory completion” comprehends.

Plaintiff Arnold Haymore, a contractor and builder, was constructing the house in question at Holladay in Salt Lake County. In November of 1955, when it was well along toward completion, defendants con…