Legal Opinion

Bomberger v. McKelvey

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1950No. Sac. 5947PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action against D. P. McKelvey to recover a sum of money promised for the demolition and removal of a building which stood on real property purchased by McKelvey from plaintiffs. Further, plaintiffs, as assignees of Mr. and Mrs. Fred L. Hill, sought to recover a sum of money which McKelvey promised to pay to the Hills in return for the latters’ surrender of a lease of the premises. A counterclaim and cross-complaint was filed against plaintiffs and the Hills seeking damages for trespass and waste. R. G. MeKelvey, who had become a coowner of the property, joined in this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kuzinich v. County of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API