Legal Opinion

Nordin Construction Company v. City of Nome

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1971No. 1290, 1299 and 1520PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This case revolves around the award and ultimate payment by the City of Nome [hereinafter, “City”] of a construction contract for a water and sewer system in Nome to Nordin Construction Co., Inc. & Associates of Fairbanks [hereinafter, “Nordin”]. The finding by a jury required Nordin to return the money paid by the City for failure of Nordin to substantially perform the contract.

The firm of Philleo Engineering & Architectural Services of Fairbanks [hereinafter, “Philleo Engineering”] prepared the plans and specifications for the system consisting of the following basic…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API