Legal Opinion

Thirteenth & Washington Sts. Corp. v. Neslen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1953No. 7875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendants, a group of lawyers, vacated certain office space before their lease on it had run, claiming a constructive eviction. Plaintiff, their lessor, was unable to re-rent the space at the same rent until 8 months later and sued for loss of rent during that period. The trial court entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, charging: that the evidence does not support the findings, and that the findings which were made do not constitute a constructive eviction.

The building involved, now known as the Darling Building, was formerly a large department store on Main…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Jessen v. Peterson, Nelson & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Fouch v. BatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Palumbo v. Olympia Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Hotel Marion Co. v. WatersOregon Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Stevan v. BrownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Scott v. PrazmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API