Legal Opinion

Mel Hardman Productions, Inc. v. Robinson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1979No. 16366PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Mel Hardman Productions, Inc. (hereinafter Productions) sued defendant Dick Robinson and his corporation, Adanac Film Productions, (hereinafter Robinson) for breach of contract for failing to deliver a nature motion picture based on the life of one Grizzly Adams.

Robinson denied that allegation and filed a counterclaim against Schick-Sunn Classic Pictures, Inc. (hereinafter Pictures), a subsidiary of Productions. Robinson alleges that he fully performed the contract, but that after he had delivered his film to Productions, the latter made a movie based upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Koer v. Mayfair MarketsUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Uptown Appliance & Radio Co., Inc. v. FLINTUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. McCloud v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MoosmanUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. VanDyke v. Mountain Coin MacHine Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API