In Re First State Bank of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Frank Mathew-s, Assigned Judge. Proceeding instituted for the correction and adjustment of the assessment of the property of the First State Bank of Oklahoma City for the year 1915. From a judgment of the district court reversing an order of the county board of equalization of Oklahoma c-ouniy, the board brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, O. J.
The one assignment of error contained in the brief of plaintiffs in error is that:
“The lower court erred in reversing the action of the board of county commissioners sitting as a board of equalization."
The assignment is insufficient under rule 26 of the Supreme Court (47 Okla. page x, 165 Pac. ix) to present for review the errors alleged to have been committed by the trial court. By it we are not informed in what respect the trial court erred, but simply that it did err; neither are we able to say, from an examination of the record, of what the error consisted, as the journal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Southern Surety Co. v. TurnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Protest of First Nat. Bank of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Hamilton, Co. v. International Bank of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In Re Assessment of Walters National Bank of WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Foster v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Hale v. StreeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.