Noble State Bank v. Haskell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, District Court, Logan County; A. II. Ilusión, Judge- Action by the Noble State Bank against O. N. Haskell and others. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings error. This is a proceeding by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, seeking to reverse the judgment of the district court sustaining the demurrers of the defendants in error, as defendants, in the lower court to plaintiff’s petition.
Read the full summary
Error from, District Court, Logan County; A. II. Ilusión, Judge- Action by the Noble State Bank against O. N. Haskell and others. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings error. This is a proceeding by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, seeking to reverse the judgment of the district court sustaining the demurrers of the defendants in error, as defendants, in the lower court to plaintiff’s petition. The constitutionality of an act of the Legislature of this state creating a depositor’s guaranty fund is involved. The petition, omitting the caption and exhibits, is as follows: “Comes the…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiff in error contends that the carrying into.efEect of what is known as the “Depositors’ Guaranty Law” will impair its charter contractual rights. Section 2 of the act of December 17, 1907 (Laws 1907-08, p. 146, c. 6, art. 2), establishing the depositors’ guaranty fund, etc., provides as follows:
“Within sixty days after the passage and approval of this act. the State Banking Board shall levy against the capital stock an assessment of one per cent, of the bank’s daily average deposits, less the deposits of the state funds, properly secured for the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Kimery v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.