Legal Opinion

Hamilton, Co. v. International Bank of Haskell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1924No. 13247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydick, J.

This case arose in a proceeding before the county treasurer of Mush kogee county wherein the treasurer, upon information furnished by a tax ferret and under the provisions of section 9798, Comp. Stat. 1921, assessed the International Bank of I-Iaskell upon $15,000 of .public building bonds as property alleged to have been omitted from taxation for the years 1910-1920, inclusive. The bank appealed to the county court, and there the state moved the county court to dismiss the appeal because no notice of appeal was served upon the tax ferret' or county commissioners and because the county count…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Fisher v. SpillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. In Re Assessment of Durant Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. In Re Daniel's Omitted PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. In Re Assessment of Alleged Omitted Property of KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. In Re Asssessment of Property of KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Thomas v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API