Legal Opinion

Yolo Water & Power Co. v. Edmands

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1920No. Civ. No. 1857PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.

Action in condemnation. This action was brought by the appellant, a public service corporation, against defendants and some 200 other persons to condemn certain real property situated on the shores of Clear Lake, in Lake County, in this state. The action was dismissed as to all save the above-named defendants, respondents herein. After a trial by jury a judgment was rendered by the superior court of the county of Mendocino, on the twenty-second day of October, 1917, condemning the lands sought by the appellant and fixing the damages at the gross sum of $105,600.

Clear…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Crosby v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Churchill Co. v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Lincoln Northern Railway Co. v. WiswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Maginnis v. HurlbuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In Re Memorial Hall SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. United States v. Claude S. Gossett Et Ux., United States of America v. Charles D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. 412.715 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.District Court, N.D. California · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API